Skip to content

Ch10 Monopoly

核心概念

for comepetition, 不管產量多少,價格都一樣
→ MR = P

but for monopoly, 產量提高時,價格降低
→ MR = P - △P×先前Q

Will set price/quantity to where marginal profit = 0 i.e. MR = MC.

Calculation tips
Remember when calculating equilibrium price/quantity with MR = MC, do the partial derivative of Q instead of P, as the corresponding P on MR curve != the actual P on demand curve. If you want to calculate the equilibrium with P, calculate with marginal profit = 0 instead.

Lerner Index

ch10-monopoly-1.png

the elasticity of the demand curve

ch10-monopoly-2.png

it's negative

ch10-monopoly-3.png ch10-monopoly-4.png

Monopoly vs. Competition

ch10-monopoly-5.png

subsidy monopoly

理論上可以補助 monopoly 使 monopoly 產出到 Q~C~ (最 efficient 產量)
使 social gain 跟 competitive 時一樣 ch10-monopoly-6.png C+D+F+G 必> F+G+H
否則 monopoly 原本就會選擇產出到 Q~C~ 而非 Q~M~

Price Ceiling

ch10-monopoly-7.png

Zero Profit Monopoly

如果要求 monopoly 跟 competition 一樣 zero economic profits

ch10-monopoly-8.png

natural monopoly

natural monopoly

if AC crosses demand curve when slope < 0

ch10-monopoly-9.png

→ competitive 下的 P (\(P_C\), where MC = D) < AC
→ earn negative profit if competitive
→ competitive industry 不可能存在

所以會給 limited time 的 patent,兼顧廠商的 profit & 社會福利

e.g. - 一家軟體廠商
開發完軟體之後的複製費用幾乎為零
因此 AC i.e. \(\dfrac{開發費用}{產量}\) 斜向下
demand curve 交 AC 於 AC 斜向下處
又 MC 交 AC 於 AC 最小值處
- 台電花大錢架好供電網路之後的 MC 就很小了 因此形成 natural monopoly

innovation for natural monopoly

不是一定會造成正向 social gain

e.g. 
花 $50M 增加一個小小功能,使自家產品比他牌強,因而獲得大量客戶,
但實際上對客戶造成的 gain 只有 $10M 的價值  
→ good for company, bad for society ( $-40M social gain)

Price Discrimination

charge different price for identical items

First-Degree

  • 完全知道每個人的需求曲線並依此定價,榨光所有 consumers' surplus
  • monopolist 會生產至 competition quantity (D=MC) → social welfare maximized, no deadweight loss

ch10-monopoly-10.png

Second-Degree

price depends on quantity, no individual differences

e.g.
香腸 1 支 $20,3 支 $50
等同於前兩支 $20,第三支 $10
ch10-monopoly-11.png\(Q_0\) 賣 $10 (where MR=MC),\(Q_0\) 之後賣 $10 > P > MC (e.g. \(Q_0\) - \(Q_1\) 賣 competitive price $7) → 深藍色三角形的 producer's surplus & 淺藍的 consumers' surplus

quantity & PS & CS & social welfare increases

Third-Degree

different price in different markets Man City 的人願意用 $7 買 whatever quantity → \(MR_{city}=\$7\) ch10-monopoly-12.png ch10-monopoly-13.png

ch10-monopoly-14.jpg ch10-monopoly-15.png

黃曜霆的 mail ch10-monopoly-16.jpg

Two-Part Tariff

e.g. monopoly 入場後商品,再用入場費吸光 consumers' surplus ch10-monopoly-17.png

Homework

注意

N~2~ c

ch10-monopoly-18.png

ch10-monopoly-19.png

ch10-monopoly-20.png

ch10-monopoly-21.png

ch10-monopoly-22.png ch10-monopoly-23.png ch10-monopoly-24.png ch10-monopoly-25.png